Blog

Results for: Automated Review

  • Maureen O'Neill
    by Maureen O'Neill
    May 4, 2012

    Judge Carter’s DaSilva Decision: Cleared for Takeoff?

    The e-discovery community has been abuzz since last week, when District Judge Carter issued a decision in DaSilva Moore v. Publicis Groupe SA, affirming Magistrate Judge Peck’s order approving an ESI protocol that provides for the use of predictive coding.  Read where Maureen’s reaction lies.

  • Matt Miller
    by Matt Miller
    April 17, 2012

    One Size Doesn’t Fit All in Predictive Coding

    In the last several months, predictive coding technology has evolved from a fanciful presentation topic for legal conferences and industry events to an important discovery tool that is rapidly gaining acceptance in courtrooms. While the legal foundation for using predictive coding may still be muddy, it is clear that counsel needs trusted experts to help them navigate this new territory.

  • Amy Hinzmann
    by Amy Hinzmann
    March 23, 2012

    Financial Services Industry Weighs Rewards, Risk of Automated Review

    The word on the street is that the age of automation has arrived for document review. This presents unique challenges for the financial services industry. There was a consensus among the panel I moderated at LegalTech 2012 that a vendor must take certain steps to ease our more cautious clients into the automated review process. These steps include […]

  • Matt Miller
    by Matt Miller
    February 17, 2012

    Predictive Coding Tipping Point?

    In his last blog, DiscoverReady CEO Jim Wagner asserted that 2012 might be the year that predictive coding finally gains a foothold in the document review space. Based on a recent hearing in front of Judge Andrew Peck in the S.D.N.Y, it looks like Jim’s prediction is right on target.

  • Jim Wagner
    by Jim Wagner
    January 31, 2012

    2012 Prediction: Predictive Coding Arrives, Ready or Not

    The field of legal technology, and e-discovery in particular, is interesting. There’s a sentiment that the “favorite technology” changes every three to five years. Jim thinks that’s mostly true. Then there’s the saying that when it comes to this industry, the faces never change. And then there’s the truism that the legal industry is painfully slow to change. Don’t hold your breath, but Jim thinks, on this count, 2012 will be different.

Page123